Independent Review: UVU Employees Not at ‘Willful and Wanton Disregard’ in Fatal Campus Shooting, Report Notes Security Gaps
An independent review commissioned by Utah Valley University (UVU) concluded that university employees and agents did not act in "willful and wanton disregard" leading up to the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk on campus. However, the report identified significant areas…

Salt Lake City, UT, September 25, 2026 — An independent review commissioned by Utah Valley University (UVU) has concluded that university employees and agents did not act in “willful and wanton disregard” prior to the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk on campus. The report, however, also highlighted significant areas where the university’s security protocols and operational procedures require improvement.
The findings from the review indicate that while no willful or wanton misconduct was identified among UVU personnel in connection with the incident, the university faces notable challenges in several key operational domains. These include the effectiveness of its security protocols, the strategic planning of events, the coordination efforts with external organizations, and the current structure and staffing levels of its police department.
Furthermore, the review acknowledged specific shortcomings related to the implementation of existing policies and the delegation of decision-making authority, particularly concerning the management of high-profile events. The report did not specify the exact nature of these policy implementation issues or the extent of the deficiencies in decision-making authority.
The circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk on the UVU campus, and the subsequent review, point to a need for comprehensive updates and enhancements to the university’s safety and security infrastructure. The report emphasizes that while the conduct of individuals was not deemed intentionally reckless, the university’s preparedness and operational framework are areas that require immediate attention and reform.
Specific details regarding the proposed improvements to security protocols, event planning methodologies, and inter-agency coordination were not provided in the summary of the review’s findings. The contractor who conducted the independent review was not named, nor was the specific timeline of the events leading up to the shooting or the date it occurred. The report also did not detail the specific nature of the shortcomings in policy implementation or decision-making authority, nor did it outline any disciplinary actions or specific remediation plans that UVU intends to undertake in response to the identified areas for improvement.
The review’s conclusions serve as a roadmap for UVU to strengthen its commitment to campus safety by addressing identified gaps in its security apparatus and administrative processes, ensuring better preparedness for future high-profile events.
Story summarized from the original created by Katie McKellar on utahnewsdispatch.com, see more information here.
Media gallery
